![]() The constant need for men to prove themselves to each other and to the opposite sex that they are strong, crafty, and victorious is tiring. An individual is free to consider their sexual and gender identity and role afresh, the weight of their socially expected role lifted off them." No part of social gender identity need to be carried on in her space. The Dominatrix defies the social rules and artificial norms imposed on individuals by mixing attributes and revealing both in her alchemy. Society, however, imposes an artificial binary allegiance to a fixed gender identification and compliance with its attendant gender role. Anne O Nomis, author of "The History & Arts of the Dominatrix" writes: "Every individual may have election of both genders within them, in their personality and attributes. If women would consider the pressures and expectations of what is required to be a successful, desirable male in society, they would have greater appreciation for the disposable sex. The Mistress and sissy are not reinforcing the existing norms: they are challenging and repurposing it into a fun, perverted game for their own gratification.Īdhering to one set of gender norms can be exhausting. It is arousing for the very reason that the social constructs underlying many fetishes are taboo when inverted. Sissification is about erasing masculinity rather than debasing femininity. Nevertheless, kink itself consciously explores and distorts sexism. ![]() Does this really suggest that men are superior to women and that the role-reversal actually reinforces that attitude? The answer is NO. It appears to be self-defeating to the Mistress as She cheers this on by degrading Her sissy for these very reasons. A typical way in which a more dominant boy insults and subjugated a weaker one is to call him a "girl" or "sissy" or "homosexual", thereby regarding the feminine in the pejorative. Beginning in primary school, the overarching presumption is that males are the stronger gender. It is not difficult to trace the origins of this fallacy to the earliest of childhood interactions. On the surface, it is too easy to interpret sissification as sexist because femininity is humiliating for a man. It is arguable that there is some underlying misogyny enabling the dynamic. He abdicates his male status so that he CAN assume these submissive roles for Her. The sissy wants to be the Mistress' plaything, object, slut, and whore. ![]() He is but a caricature of a woman, therein lies his humiliation. Laughing and pointing at his ridiculousness, the Mistress reminds him that he is but an inferior MALE and that beauty is reserved only for women. ![]() The sheer attempt of trying to be a pretty girl is humiliating, often resulting in a distorted version of what he can never be. Women are so superior in their beauty and sensuality that he, no matter how hard he tries, can never be like them. On the other hand, the humiliation aspect of forced feminization does not always have to stem from a lack of masculinity but rather the failed emulation of femininity. He becomes exposed, controlled, and liberated all at once. This element of emasculation is intense, especially when ordered to perform what are traditionally "female tasks" such as cleaning and cooking under the scrutiny of the Mistress(es). He becomes an object for said woman to toy with and use based on Her terms and Her preferences. This is liberating to him in that the extreme pressures to 'perform' and 'impress' women are lifted. The humiliation of being feminized intensifies when the sissy is forced to crossdress before a woman, the gender to which he should be proving his male sexual prowess and reproductive value. I destroy his construct of manhood, causing his sense of self to collapse, and indoctrinate him into My female world. By forcing him to cross this boundary, I assume ownership (even if temporarily) of his masculine identity and the belief system that was built around it to make him feel empowered in his world. First and foremost, it is a potent way for Me to demonstrate My power and control over a man by forcing him to wear that which is deemed socially unacceptable for him. I enjoy the illicit thrill of dressing up a male sub in women's attire-lingerie, dresses, high-heels-for a variety of reasons. It challenges and reshapes our understanding of traditional masculinity, femininity, misogyny and sexism. As with all forms of kink, the feminization of the male sub and its multi-layered pleasures is highly psychological. Sissy, sissy-maid, sissy-slut, sissy-bitch, cross dresser, transvestite, androgyne, eunuch-I use these terms to describe a certain brand of sub who I love to feminize and emasculate. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |